Abstract
In October 2007, a governmental 3-year target to reduce Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) by 30%, with financial penalties levied for failure, was introduced in England. This target was met within just 1 year, leading to speculation of 'gaming', with hospitals empirically treating possible CDI in the absence of a microbiological diagnosis, to avoid having to report confirmed cases. An analysis of aggregate mandatory data on levels of testing for C. difficile toxin showed little evidence of a fall in testing during the steepest infection rate reductions, suggesting that this was not a major factor in the decline in CDI.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 850.e1-850.e4 |
| Journal | Clinical Microbiology and Infection |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Sept 2015 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:All of the authors work for Public Health England, which is funded by the British Government . None of the authors have anything else to declare.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015.
Keywords
- Clostridium difficile
- England
- Objectives
- Stool samples
- Toxin testing