Cancer risks among studies of medical diagnostic radiation exposure in early life without quantitative estimates of dose

Mark P. Little*, Richard Wakeford, Simon D. Bouffler, Kossi Abalo, Michael Hauptmann, Nobuyuki Hamada, Gerald M. Kendall

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: There is accumulating evidence of excess risk of cancer in various populations exposed at acute doses below several tens of mSv or doses received over a protracted period. There is also evidence that relative risks are generally higher after radiation exposures in utero or in childhood. Methods and findings: We reviewed and summarised evidence from 89 studies of cancer following medical diagnostic exposure in utero or in childhood, in which no direct estimates of radiation dose are available. In all of the populations studied exposure was to sparsely ionizing radiation (X-rays). Several of the early studies of in utero exposure exhibit modest but statistically significant excess risks of several types of childhood cancer. There is a highly significant (p < 0.0005) negative trend of odds ratio with calendar period of study, so that more recent studies tend to exhibit reduced excess risk. There is no significant inter-study heterogeneity (p > 0.3). In relation to postnatal exposure there are significant excess risks of leukaemia, brain and solid cancers, with indications of variations in risk by cancer type (p = 0.07) and type of exposure (p = 0.02), with fluoroscopy and computed tomography scans associated with the highest excess risk. However, there is highly significant inter-study heterogeneity (p < 0.01) for all cancer endpoints and all but one type of exposure, although no significant risk trend with calendar period of study. Conclusions: Overall, this large body of data relating to medical diagnostic radiation exposure in utero provides support for an associated excess risk of childhood cancer. However, the pronounced heterogeneity in studies of postnatal diagnostic exposure, the implied uncertainty as to the meaning of summary measures, and the distinct possibilities of bias, substantially reduce the strength of the evidence from the associations we observe between radiation imaging in childhood and the subsequent risk of cancer being causally related to radiation exposure.

Original languageEnglish
Article number154723
JournalScience of the Total Environment, The
Volume832
Early online date26 Mar 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2022
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022

Keywords

  • Childhood
  • In utero
  • Radiation
  • cancer risk

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cancer risks among studies of medical diagnostic radiation exposure in early life without quantitative estimates of dose'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this