Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Cancer diagnoses after emergency GP referral or A&E attendance in England: Determinants and time trends in routes to diagnosis data, 2006-2015

  • Annie Herbert
  • , Gary A. Abel
  • , Sam Winters
  • , Sean McPhail
  • , Lucy Elliss-Brookes
  • , Georgios Lyratzopoulos*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    46 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Background Diagnosis of cancer as an emergency is associated with poor outcomes but has a complex aetiology. Examining determinants and time trends in diagnostic routes can help to appreciate the critical role of general practice over time in diagnostic pathways for patients with cancer. Aim To examine sociodemographic, cancer site, and temporal associations with type of presentation among patients with cancer diagnosed as emergencies. Design and setting Analysis of Routes to Diagnosis data, 2006-2015, for patients with cancer in England. Method The authors estimated adjusted proportions of emergency presentation after emergency GP referral (GP-EP) or presentation to accident and emergency (AE-EP), by patient sex, age, deprivation group, and year of diagnosis using multivariable regression. Results Among 554 621 patients presenting as emergencies, 24% (n = 130 372) presented as GP-EP, 62% as AE-EP (n = 346 192), and 14% (n = 78 057) through Other-EP sub-routes. Patients presenting as emergencies were more likely to have been GP-referred if they lived in less deprived areas or were subsequently diagnosed with pancreatic, gallbladder, or ovarian cancer, or acute leukaemia. During the study period the proportion and number of GP-EPs nearly halved (31%, n = 17 364, in 2006; 17%, n = 9155 in 2015), while that of AE-EP increased (55%, n = 31 049 to 68%, n = 36 868). Conclusion Patients presenting as emergencies with cancers characterised by symptoms/signs tolerable by patients but appropriately alarming to doctors (for example, pancreatic cancer manifesting as painless jaundice) are over-represented among cases whose emergency presentation involved GP referral. Reductions in diagnoses of cancer through an emergency presentation likely reflect both the continually increasing use of 2-week-wait GP referrals during the study period and reductions in emergency GP referrals.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)E724-E730
    JournalBritish Journal of General Practice
    Volume69
    Issue number687
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2019

    Bibliographical note

    Funding Information:
    Annie Herbert and Georgios Lyratzopoulos are supported by a Cancer Research UK Advanced Clinician Scientist Fellowship to Georgios Lyratzopoulos (award reference: C18081/A18180). Georgios Lyratzopoulos is associate director (co-investigator) and Gary A Abel collaborator of the multi-institutional CanTest Research Collaborative funded by a Cancer Research UK Population Research Catalyst award (award reference: C8640/A23385).

    Publisher Copyright:
    © British Journal of General Practice.

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Keywords

    • Early diagnosis
    • Emergencies
    • Patients
    • Population groups
    • Referral and consultation

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Cancer diagnoses after emergency GP referral or A&E attendance in England: Determinants and time trends in routes to diagnosis data, 2006-2015'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this