Built Environment and SARS-CoV-2 Transmission in Long-Term Care Facilities: Cross-Sectional Survey and Data Linkage

  • Maria Krutikov*
  • , Oliver Stirrup
  • , Chris Fuller
  • , Natalie Adams
  • , Borscha Azmi
  • , Aidan Irwin-Singer
  • , Niyathi Sethu
  • , Andrew Hayward
  • , Hector Altamirano
  • , Andrew Copas
  • , Laura Shallcross
  • *Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    5 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Objectives: To describe the built environment in long-term care facilities (LTCF) and its association with introduction and transmission of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Design: Cross-sectional survey with linkage to routine surveillance data. Setting and Participants: LTCFs in England caring for adults ≥65 years old, participating in the VIVALDI study (ISRCTN14447421) were eligible. Data were included from residents and staff. Methods: Cross-sectional survey of the LTCF built environment with linkage to routinely collected asymptomatic and symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 testing and vaccination data between September 1, 2020, and March 31, 2022. We used individual and LTCF level Poisson and Negative Binomial regression models to identify risk factors for 4 outcomes: incidence rate of resident infections and outbreaks, outbreak size, and duration. We considered interactions with variant transmissibility (pre vs post Omicron dominance). Results: A total of 134 of 151 (88.7%) LTCFs participated in the survey, contributing data for 13,010 residents and 17,766 staff. After adjustment and stratification, outbreak incidence (measuring infection introduction) was only associated with SARS-CoV-2 incidence in the community [incidence rate ratio (IRR) for high vs low incidence, 2.84; 95% CI, 1.85–4.36]. Characteristics of the built environment were associated with transmission outcomes and differed by variant transmissibility. For resident infection incidence, factors included number of storeys (0.64; 0.43–0.97) and bedrooms (1.04; 1.02–1.06), and purpose-built vs converted buildings (1.99; 1.08–3.69). Air quality was associated with outbreak size (dry vs just right 1.46; 1.00–2.13). Funding model (0.99; 0.99–1.00), crowding (0.98; 0.96–0.99), and bedroom temperature (1.15; 1.01–1.32) were associated with outbreak duration. Conclusions and Implications: We describe previously undocumented diversity in LTCF built environments. LTCFs have limited opportunities to prevent SARS-CoV-2 introduction, which was only driven by community incidence. However, adjusting the built environment, for example by isolating infected residents or improving airflow, may reduce transmission, although data quality was limited by subjectivity. Identifying LTCF built environment modifications that prevent infection transmission should be a research priority.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)304-313.e11
    JournalJournal of the American Medical Directors Association
    Volume25
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Feb 2024

    Bibliographical note

    Publisher Copyright:
    © 2023 The Authors

    Keywords

    • COVID-19
    • built environment
    • infection prevention & control
    • infection transmission
    • long-term care
    • older adults

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Built Environment and SARS-CoV-2 Transmission in Long-Term Care Facilities: Cross-Sectional Survey and Data Linkage'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this