Boosting immunity to influenza H5N1 with MF59-adjuvanted H5N3 A/Duck/Singapore/97 vaccine in a primed human population

Iain Stephenson*, Karl G. Nicholson, Anthony Colegate, Audino Podda, John Wood, Ellen Ypma, Maria Zambon

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

149 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In 1997, influenza A/Hong Kong/97 (H5N1) emerged as a potential human threat. In 1999, a randomised study comparing two doses of MF59-adjuvanted and non-adjuvanted influenza A/Duck/Singapore/97 (H5N3) surface-antigen vaccine found non-adjuvanted vaccine was poorly immunogenic. Addition of MF59 significantly boosted antibody to H5N1 to levels associated with protection. At 16 months, we undertook a follow-up study to assess the effect of H5N3 revaccination. Geometric mean titres (GMTs) of antibody by haemagglutination-inhibition (HI), microneutralisation (MN) and single radial haemolysis (SRH) indicated that protective antibody titres did not exist at 16 months after two-dose priming. Twenty-one days after revaccination, there was significant boosting of antibody compared to GMTs achieved 21 days after two-dose priming in the original study (P<0.001). MF59 significantly increased GMTs of antibody when compared to non-adjuvanted vaccine (P<0.001).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1687-1693
Number of pages7
JournalVaccine
Volume21
Issue number15
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Apr 2003

Bibliographical note

Copyright:
Copyright 2008 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • Adjuvant
  • Avian influenza
  • Vaccination

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Boosting immunity to influenza H5N1 with MF59-adjuvanted H5N3 A/Duck/Singapore/97 vaccine in a primed human population'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this