Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Biomedical prevention: State of the science

  • Sheena M. McCormack*
  • , Mitzy Gafos
  • , Monica Desai
  • , Myron S. Cohen
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and treatment as prevention (TasP) involve the use of antiretroviral (ARV) drugs by human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-negative and-positive individuals to reduce HIV acquisition and transmission, respectively. Clinical science has delivered a consistently high effect size for TasP and a range from 0%-73% reduction in incidence across placebo-controlled PrEP trials. However, the quality of evidence for PrEP compares favorably with evidence for postexposure prophylaxis (PEP). It is clear from treatment programs and PrEP trials that daily adherence presents challenges to a large proportion of the population. Although there are factors associated with inconsistent use (ie, younger age), they do not assist clinicians at the point of care. There are additional provider concerns about PrEP (covering cost of drug and delivery, undermining condom promotion, and facilitating resistant strains) that have delayed widespread acceptance. These issues need to be addressed in order to realize the full public health potential of antiretrovirals.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)S41-S46
JournalClinical Infectious Diseases
Volume59
Issue numberSUPPL.1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2014
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • PrEP
  • TasP.
  • postexposure prophylaxis
  • preexposure prophylaxis
  • treatment as prevention

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Biomedical prevention: State of the science'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this