Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Bilingual comparison of Mandarin and English cognitive bias tasks

  • Louise Smith
  • , Wing Gi Leung
  • , Bryony Crane
  • , Brian Parkinson
  • , Timothea Toulopoulou
  • , Jenny Yiend*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Most research into cognitive biases has used Western samples, despite potential East-West socio-cultural differences. One reason is the lack of appropriate measures for non-Westerners. This study is about cross-linguistic equivalence which needs to be established before assessing cross-cultural differences in future research. We developed parallel Mandarin and English measures of interpretation bias and attention bias using back-translation and decentering procedures. We assessed task equivalence by administering both sets of measures to 47 bilingual Mandarin-English speakers. Interpretation bias measurement was similar and reliable across language versions, confirming suitability of the Mandarin versions for future cross-cultural research. By contrast, scores on attention bias tasks did not intercorrelate reliably, suggesting that nonverbal stimuli such as pictures or facial expressions of emotion might present better prospects for cross-cultural comparison. The development of the first set of equivalent measures of interpretation bias in an Eastern language paves the way for future research investigating East-West differences in biased cognition.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)302-312
Number of pages11
JournalBehavior Research Methods
Volume50
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2018
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, The Author(s).

Keywords

  • Attention
  • Cognitive bias
  • Cross-cultural
  • Emotion
  • Information processing
  • Interpretation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bilingual comparison of Mandarin and English cognitive bias tasks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this