Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Association between self-reported signs and symptoms and SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection in UK key workers

  • Ranya Mulchandani
  • , Sian Taylor-Philips
  • , Hayley E. Jones
  • , A. E. Ades
  • , Raymond Borrow
  • , Ezra Linley
  • , Peter Kirwan
  • , Richard Stewart
  • , Philippa Moore
  • , John Boyes
  • , Anil Hormis
  • , Neil Todd
  • , Antoanela Colda
  • , Ian Reckless
  • , Tim Brooks
  • , Andre Charlett
  • , Matthew Hickman
  • , Isabel Oliver
  • , David Wyllie*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)
28 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Screening for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies is under way in some key worker groups; how this adds to self-reported COVID-19 illness is unclear. In this study, we investigate the association between self-reported belief of COVID-19 illness and seropositivity. 

Methods: Cross-sectional study of three key worker streams comprising (A) Police and Fire & Rescue (2 sites) (B) healthcare workers (1 site) and (C) healthcare workers with previously positive PCR result (5 sites). We collected self-reported signs and symptoms of COVID-19 and compared this with serology results from two SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays (Roche Elecsys® and EUROIMMUN). 

Results: Between 01 and 26 June, we recruited 2847 individuals (Stream A: 1,247, Stream B: 1,546 and Stream C: 154). Amongst those without previous positive PCR tests, 687/2,579 (26%) reported belief they had COVID-19, having experienced compatible symptoms; however, only 208 (30.3%) of these were seropositive on both immunoassays. Both immunoassays had high sensitivities relative to previous PCR positivity (>93%); there was also limited decline in antibody titres up to 110 days post symptom onset. Symptomatic but seronegative individuals had differing symptom profiles and shorter illnesses than seropositive individuals. 

Conclusion: Non-COVID-19 respiratory illness may have been mistaken for COVID-19 during the outbreak; laboratory testing is more specific than self-reported key worker beliefs in ascertaining past COVID-19 disease.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)151-161
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Infection
Volume82
Issue number5
Early online date26 Mar 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information: The study was funded by Public Health England and supported by the NIHR Clinical Research Network (CRN) Portfolio.

Open Access: This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Publisher Copyright: Crown Copyright © 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The British Infection Association.

Citation: Mulchandani, Ranya, et al. "Association between self-reported signs and symptoms and SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection in UK key workers." Journal of Infection (2021).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2021.03.019

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Antibodies
  • Covid-19
  • Symptoms
  • United kingdom
  • serology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Association between self-reported signs and symptoms and SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection in UK key workers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this