Abstract
State-of-the-art dose assessment models were applied to estimate doses to the population in urban areas contaminated by the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident. Assessment results were compared among five models, and comparisons of model predictions with actual measurements were also made. Assessments were performed using both probabilistic and deterministic approaches. Predicted dose distributions for indoor and outdoor workers from a probabilistic approach were in good agreement with the actual measurements. In addition, when the models were applied to assess the doses to the representative person, based on a concept recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection and in the International Atomic Energy Agency Safety Standards, it was evident that doses to the representative person obtained with a deterministic approach were always higher than those obtained with a probabilistic approach using the same model.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 020517 |
Journal | Journal of Radiological Protection |
Volume | 42 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 31 May 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information: The authors would like to acknowledge the contribution of all participants in the IAEA’s MODARIA and MODARIA II Working Group 2: Assessment of Exposures and Countermeasures in Urban Environments. The activities of the Working Group have been supported by cooperation from Japan Atomic Energy Agency and the International Atomic Energy Agency.Open Access: No Open Access licence.
Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Society for Radiological Protection. Published on behalf of SRP by IOP Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
Citation: Shogo Takahara et al 2022 J. Radiol. Prot. 42 020517
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/ac7088
Keywords
- dose assessment
- representative person
- urban environments