TY - JOUR
T1 - Appropriateness of acute-care antibiotic prescriptions for community-acquired infections and surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in England
T2 - analysis of 2016 national point prevalence survey data
AU - Higgins, H.
AU - Freeman, R.
AU - Doble, A.
AU - Hood, G.
AU - Islam, J.
AU - Gerver, S.
AU - Henderson, K. L.
AU - Demirjian, A.
AU - Hopkins, S.
AU - Ashiru-Oredope, D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023
PY - 2023/12
Y1 - 2023/12
N2 - Background: Estimates of inappropriate prescribing can highlight key target areas for antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) and inform national targets. Objectives: To (1) define and (2) produce estimates of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing levels within acute hospital trusts in England. Methods: The 2016 national Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAI), Antimicrobial Use (AMU) and AMS point prevalence survey (PPS) was used to derive estimates of inappropriate prescribing, focusing on the four most reported community-acquired antibiotic indications (CAIs) in the PPS and surgical prophylaxis. Definitions of appropriate antibiotic therapy for each indication were developed through the compilation of national treatment guidelines. A Likert-scale system of appropriateness coding was validated and refined through a two-stage expert review process. Results: Antimicrobial usage prevalence data were collected for 25,741 individual antibiotic prescriptions, representing 17,884 patients and 213 hospitals in England. 30.4% of prescriptions for the four CAIs of interest were estimated to be inappropriate (2054 prescriptions). The highest percentage of inappropriate prescribing occurred in uncomplicated cystitis prescriptions (62.5%), followed by bronchitis (48%). For surgical prophylaxis, 30.8% of prescriptions were inappropriate in terms of dose number, and 21.3% in terms of excess prophylaxis duration. Conclusions: The 2016 prevalence of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing in hospitals in England was approximated to be 30.4%; this establishes a baseline prevalence and provided indication of where AMS interventions should be prioritized. Our definitions appraised antibiotic choice, treatment duration and dose number (surgical prophylaxis only); however, they did not consider other aspects of appropriateness, such as combination therapy – this is an important area for future work.
AB - Background: Estimates of inappropriate prescribing can highlight key target areas for antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) and inform national targets. Objectives: To (1) define and (2) produce estimates of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing levels within acute hospital trusts in England. Methods: The 2016 national Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAI), Antimicrobial Use (AMU) and AMS point prevalence survey (PPS) was used to derive estimates of inappropriate prescribing, focusing on the four most reported community-acquired antibiotic indications (CAIs) in the PPS and surgical prophylaxis. Definitions of appropriate antibiotic therapy for each indication were developed through the compilation of national treatment guidelines. A Likert-scale system of appropriateness coding was validated and refined through a two-stage expert review process. Results: Antimicrobial usage prevalence data were collected for 25,741 individual antibiotic prescriptions, representing 17,884 patients and 213 hospitals in England. 30.4% of prescriptions for the four CAIs of interest were estimated to be inappropriate (2054 prescriptions). The highest percentage of inappropriate prescribing occurred in uncomplicated cystitis prescriptions (62.5%), followed by bronchitis (48%). For surgical prophylaxis, 30.8% of prescriptions were inappropriate in terms of dose number, and 21.3% in terms of excess prophylaxis duration. Conclusions: The 2016 prevalence of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing in hospitals in England was approximated to be 30.4%; this establishes a baseline prevalence and provided indication of where AMS interventions should be prioritized. Our definitions appraised antibiotic choice, treatment duration and dose number (surgical prophylaxis only); however, they did not consider other aspects of appropriateness, such as combination therapy – this is an important area for future work.
KW - Acute care
KW - Antimicrobial
KW - Antimicrobial resistance
KW - Antimicrobial stewardship
KW - Inappropriate prescribing
KW - Prescribing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85175702104&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jhin.2023.10.006
DO - 10.1016/j.jhin.2023.10.006
M3 - Article
C2 - 37858806
AN - SCOPUS:85175702104
SN - 0195-6701
VL - 142
SP - 115
EP - 129
JO - Journal of Hospital Infection
JF - Journal of Hospital Infection
ER -