Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance continues to be a considerable threat to global public health due to the persistent inappropriate use of antibiotics. Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs are essential in reducing the growth and spread of antibiotic resistance, in an environment which lacks incentives for the development of new antibiotics. Over the years, a variety of resources have been developed to strengthen antimicrobial stewardship. However, the differences in resources available present a challenge for organisations/teams to establish the best resources to utilise for service provision. A peer review tool was formulated using four national documents on AMS and tested through three phases with feedback. A survey method was used to collect feedback on the validity, feasibility, and impact of the AMS peer review tool. Feedback received was positive from the earlier pilots. The tool was found to be useful at identifying areas of good practice and gaps in antimicrobial stewardship across various pilot sites. Feedback suggests the tool is useful for promoting improvements to AMS programs and highlights that the content and features of the tool are appropriate for evaluating stewardship.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 44 |
Pages (from-to) | 1-7 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Antibiotics |
Volume | 10 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jan 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:All participating hospitals and infection leads are acknowledged for their support in piloting the tool. In particular, the authors would like to acknowledge the East of England Antimicrobial Pharmacy Network for their initial support with shaping the original version of the peer review tool and piloting it across the region.
Keywords
- AMS
- Antimicrobial resistance
- Antimicrobial stewardship intervention
- PDSA cycle