An Observational Study Using English Syndromic Surveillance Data Collected during the 2012 London Olympics-What did Syndromic Surveillance Show and What Can We Learn for Future Mass-gathering Events?

Dan Todkill*, Helen E. Hughes, Alex Elliot, Roger Morbey, Obaghe Edeghere, Sally Harcourt, Tom Hughes, Tina Endericks, Brian McCloskey, Mike Catchpole, Sue Ibbotson, Gillian Smith

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction In preparation for the London 2012 Olympic Games, existing syndromic surveillance systems operating in England were expanded to include daily general practitioner (GP) out-of-hours (OOH) contacts and emergency department (ED) attendances at sentinel sites (the GP OOH and ED syndromic surveillance systems: GPOOHS and EDSSS). Hypothesis/Problem The further development of syndromic surveillance systems in time for the London 2012 Olympic Games provided a unique opportunity to investigate the impact of a large mass-gathering event on public health and health services as monitored in near real-time by syndromic surveillance of GP OOH contacts and ED attendances. This can, in turn, aid the planning of future events. Methods The EDSSS and GPOOHS data for London and England from July 13 to August 26, 2012, and a similar period in 2013, were divided into three distinct time periods: pre-Olympic period (July 13-26, 2012); Olympic period (July 27 to August 12); and post-Olympic period (August 13-26, 2012). Time series of selected syndromic indicators in 2012 and 2013 were plotted, compared, and risk assessed by members of the Real-time Syndromic Surveillance Team (ReSST) in Public Health England (PHE). Student's t test was used to test any identified changes in pattern of attendance. Results Very few differences were found between years or between the weeks which preceded and followed the Olympics. One significant exception was noted: a statistically significant increase (P value =.0003) in attendances for chemicals, poisons, and overdoses, including alcohol and acute alcohol intoxication were observed in London EDs coinciding with the timing of the Olympic opening ceremony (9:00 pm July 27, 2012 to 01:00 am July 28, 2012). Conclusions Syndromic surveillance was able to provide near to real-time monitoring and could identify hourly changes in patterns of presentation during the London 2012 Olympic Games. Reassurance can be provided to planners of future mass-gathering events that there was no discernible impact in overall attendances to sentinel EDs or GP OOH services in the host country. The increase in attendances for alcohol-related causes during the opening ceremony, however, may provide an opportunity for future public health interventions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)628-634
Number of pages7
JournalPrehospital and Disaster Medicine
Volume31
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2016

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine.

Keywords

  • health protection
  • mass gatherings
  • syndromic surveillance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An Observational Study Using English Syndromic Surveillance Data Collected during the 2012 London Olympics-What did Syndromic Surveillance Show and What Can We Learn for Future Mass-gathering Events?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this