An analysis of baseline data from the PROUD study: An open-label randomised trial of pre-exposure prophylaxis

On behalf of the PROUD Study Group

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has proven biological efficacy to reduce the sexual acquisition of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The PROUD study found that PrEP conferred higher protection than in placebo-controlled trials, reducing HIV incidence by 86% in a population with seven-fold higher HIV incidence than expected. We present the baseline characteristics of the PROUD study population and place the findings in the context of national sexual health clinic data. Methods: The PROUD study was designed to explore the real-world effectiveness of PrEP (tenofovir-emtricitabine) by randomising HIV-negative gay and other men who have sex with men (GMSM) to receive open-label PrEP immediately or after a deferral period of 12months. At enrolment, participants self-completed two baseline questionnaires collecting information on demographics, sexual behaviour and lifestyle in the last 30 and 90days. These data were compared to data from HIV-negative GMSM attending sexual health clinics in 2013, collated by Public Health England using the genitourinary medicine clinic activity database (GUMCAD). Results: The median age of participants was 35 (IQR: 29-43). Typically participants were white (81%), educated at a university level (61%) and in full-time employment (72%). Of all participants, 217 (40%) were born outside the UK. A sexually transmitted infection (STI) was reported to have been diagnosed in the previous 12months in 330/515 (64%) and 473/544 (87%) participants reported ever having being diagnosed with an STI. At enrolment, 47/280 (17%) participants were diagnosed with an STI. Participants reported a median (IQR) of 10 (5-20) partners in the last 90days, a median (IQR) of 2 (1-5) were condomless sex acts where the participant was receptive and 2 (1-6) were condomless where the participant was insertive. Post-exposure prophylaxis had been prescribed to 184 (34%) participants in the past 12months. The number of STI diagnoses was high compared to those reported in GUMCAD attendees. Conclusions: The PROUD study population are at substantially higher risk of acquiring HIV infection sexually than the overall population of GMSM attending sexual health clinics in England. These findings contribute to explaining the extraordinary HIV incidence rate during follow-up and demonstrate that, despite broad eligibility criteria, the population interested in PrEP was highly selective. Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN94465371. Date of registration: 28 February 2013.

Original languageEnglish
Article number163
JournalTrials
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Mar 2016

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Dolling et al.

Keywords

  • HIV prevention
  • Men who have sex with men (MSM)
  • Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP)
  • Tenofovir
  • Truvada

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An analysis of baseline data from the PROUD study: An open-label randomised trial of pre-exposure prophylaxis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this