TY - JOUR
T1 - Agar-Dilution Is Comparable to Broth Dilution for MIC Determination in Streptococcus agalactiae
AU - Portal, Edward A.R.
AU - Farley, Caitlin
AU - Iannetelli, Teresa
AU - Coelho, Juliana
AU - Efstratiou, Androulla
AU - Bentley, Stephen D.
AU - Chalker, Victoria J.
AU - Spiller, Owen B.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 by the authors.
PY - 2025/2
Y1 - 2025/2
N2 - Background: Streptococcus agalactiae (Group B Streptococcus, GBS) is a leading cause of neonatal sepsis in high-income countries. While intrapartum antibiotic screening reduces this risk, increasing resistance to macrolides and lincosamides in Europe since the 1990s has limited therapeutic options for penicillin-allergic patients. Reports of reduced beta-lactam susceptibility in GBS further emphasise the need for robust antimicrobial resistance (AMR) surveillance. However, broth microdilution (BMD) methods are unsuitable for large-scale antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST). Objective: To demonstrate that agar-dilution AST provides equivalent results to broth dilution methods, with superior capacity for high-throughput screening. Methods: Agar-dilution and microdilution AST methods were compared using a panel of 24 characterised susceptible and resistant GBS strains for benzylpenicillin, chloramphenicol, clindamycin, erythromycin, gentamicin, levofloxacin, tetracycline, and vancomycin. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) agreements were evaluated, and resistance profile correlations were assessed using Cohen’s kappa values. Results: Agar-dilution demonstrated >90% agreement with BMD MIC for most antimicrobials, except vancomycin (87.5%), erythromycin (83.33%), and tetracycline (52.78%). Cohen’s kappa values indicated strong agreement (0.88–1.00) for resistance determination. Agar-dilution avoided “trailing growth” issues associated with BMD and facilitated easier detection of non-GBS contaminants. Conclusions: Agar-dilution is a valid method for high-throughput AMR surveillance of retrospective cohorts (96 isolates per plate) and is critical for identifying emerging GBS resistance trends and informing therapeutic guidelines. However, due to the large number of plates required per antimicrobial, it is impractical for routine clinical diagnostics.
AB - Background: Streptococcus agalactiae (Group B Streptococcus, GBS) is a leading cause of neonatal sepsis in high-income countries. While intrapartum antibiotic screening reduces this risk, increasing resistance to macrolides and lincosamides in Europe since the 1990s has limited therapeutic options for penicillin-allergic patients. Reports of reduced beta-lactam susceptibility in GBS further emphasise the need for robust antimicrobial resistance (AMR) surveillance. However, broth microdilution (BMD) methods are unsuitable for large-scale antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST). Objective: To demonstrate that agar-dilution AST provides equivalent results to broth dilution methods, with superior capacity for high-throughput screening. Methods: Agar-dilution and microdilution AST methods were compared using a panel of 24 characterised susceptible and resistant GBS strains for benzylpenicillin, chloramphenicol, clindamycin, erythromycin, gentamicin, levofloxacin, tetracycline, and vancomycin. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) agreements were evaluated, and resistance profile correlations were assessed using Cohen’s kappa values. Results: Agar-dilution demonstrated >90% agreement with BMD MIC for most antimicrobials, except vancomycin (87.5%), erythromycin (83.33%), and tetracycline (52.78%). Cohen’s kappa values indicated strong agreement (0.88–1.00) for resistance determination. Agar-dilution avoided “trailing growth” issues associated with BMD and facilitated easier detection of non-GBS contaminants. Conclusions: Agar-dilution is a valid method for high-throughput AMR surveillance of retrospective cohorts (96 isolates per plate) and is critical for identifying emerging GBS resistance trends and informing therapeutic guidelines. However, due to the large number of plates required per antimicrobial, it is impractical for routine clinical diagnostics.
KW - GBS
KW - Streptococcus agalactiae
KW - antimicrobial resistance
KW - antimicrobial susceptibility testing
KW - method validation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85218899741&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/antibiotics14020156
DO - 10.3390/antibiotics14020156
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85218899741
SN - 2079-6382
VL - 14
JO - Antibiotics
JF - Antibiotics
IS - 2
M1 - 156
ER -