Advancing One human–animal–environment Health for global health security: what does the evidence say?

Jakob Zinsstag*, Andrea Kaiser-Grolimund, Kathrin Heitz-Tokpa, Rajesh Sreedharan, Juan Lubroth, François Caya, Matthew Stone, Hannah Brown, Bassirou Bonfoh, Emily Dobell, Dilys Morgan, Nusrat Homaira, Richard Kock, Jan Hattendorf, Lisa Crump, Stephanie Mauti, Victor del Rio Vilas, Sohel Saikat, Alimuddin Zumla, David HeymannOsman Dar, Stéphane de la Rocque

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

52 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this Series paper, we review the contributions of One Health approaches (ie, at the human–animal–environment interface) to improve global health security across a range of health hazards and we summarise contemporary evidence of incremental benefits of a One Health approach. We assessed how One Health approaches were reported to the Food and Agricultural Organization of the UN, the World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH, formerly OIE), and WHO, within the monitoring and assessment frameworks, including WHO International Health Regulations (2005) and WOAH Performance of Veterinary Services. We reviewed One Health theoretical foundations, methods, and case studies. Examples from joint health services and infrastructure, surveillance–response systems, surveillance of antimicrobial resistance, food safety and security, environmental hazards, water and sanitation, and zoonoses control clearly show incremental benefits of One Health approaches. One Health approaches appear to be most effective and sustainable in the prevention, preparedness, and early detection and investigation of evolving risks and hazards; the evidence base for their application is strongest in the control of endemic and neglected tropical diseases. For benefits to be maximised and extended, improved One Health operationalisation is needed by strengthening multisectoral coordination mechanisms at national, regional, and global levels.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)591-604
Number of pages14
JournalThe Lancet
Volume401
Issue number10376
Early online date16 Feb 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Feb 2023

Bibliographical note

Funding Information: We thank Athman Mwatondo for his helpful feedback on the case study of Kenya. KH-T and BB acknowledge support for their contributions to the manuscript from the Developing Excellence in Leadership, Training and Science Africa Initiative (Afrique One-ASPIRE /DEL-15-008). AZ acknowledges support from a UK National Institute for Health and Care Research Senior Investigator award. RK, AZ, DH, and OD are members of, and acknowledge support from, the Pan-African Network For Rapid Research, Response, Relief and Preparedness for Infectious Disease Epidemics, funded by the European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership, under the EU Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation.

Open Access: No Open Access licence.

Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Citation: Jakob Zinsstag, Andrea Kaiser-Grolimund, Kathrin Heitz-Tokpa, Rajesh Sreedharan, Juan Lubroth, François Caya, Matthew Stone, Hannah Brown, Bassirou Bonfoh, Emily Dobell, Dilys Morgan, Nusrat Homaira, Richard Kock, Jan Hattendorf, Lisa Crump, Stephanie Mauti, Victor del Rio Vilas, Sohel Saikat, Alimuddin Zumla, David Heymann, Osman Dar, Stéphane de la Rocque,
Advancing One human–animal–environment Health for global health security: what does the evidence say?, The Lancet, Volume 401, Issue 10376, 2023, Pages 591-604, ISSN 0140-6736, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01595-1.
(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673622015951)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01595-1.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Advancing One human–animal–environment Health for global health security: what does the evidence say?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this