Adherence to protective measures among healthcare workers in the UK: a cross-sectional study

Louise E. Smith, Danai Serfioti, Dale Weston, Neil Greenberg, G. James Rubin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Healthcare workers (HCWs) are frontline responders to emergency infectious disease outbreaks such as COVID-19. To avoid the rapid spread of disease, adherence to protective measures is paramount. We investigated rates of correct use of personal protective equipment (PPE), hand hygiene and physical distancing in UK HCWs who had been to their workplace at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic and factors associated with adherence. 

METHODS: We used an online cross-sectional survey of 1035 UK healthcare professionals (data collected 12-16 June 2020). We excluded those who had not been to their workplace in the previous 6 weeks, leaving us with a sample size of 831. Respondents were asked about their use of PPE, hand hygiene and physical distancing in the workplace. Frequency of uptake was reported descriptively; adjusted logistic regressions were used to separately investigate factors associated with adherence to use of PPE, maintaining good hand hygiene and physical distancing from colleagues. 

RESULTS: Adherence to personal protective measures was suboptimal (PPE use: 80.0%, 95% CI 77.3 to 82.8; hand hygiene: 67.8%, 95% CI 64.6 to 71.0; coming into close contact with colleagues: 74.7%, 95% CI 71.7 to 77.7). Adherence to PPE use was associated with having received training about health and safety in the workplace for COVID-19, greater perceived social pressure to adopt the behaviour and availability of PPE. Non-adherence was associated with fatalism about COVID-19 and greater perceived difficulty of adopting protective measures. Workplace design using markings to facilitate distancing was associated with adherence to physical distancing. 

CONCLUSIONS: Uptake of personal protective behaviours among UK HCWs at the start of the pandemic was variable. Factors associated with adherence provide insight into ways to support HCWs to adopt personal protective behaviours, such as ensuring that adequate PPE is available and designing workplaces to facilitate physical distancing.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)100-105
Number of pages6
JournalEmergency Medicine Journal
Volume39
Issue number2
Early online date30 Nov 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Jan 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information: LS, DW, NG and GJR are supported by the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Emergency Preparedness and Response, a partnership between the UK Health Security Agency, King’s College London and the University of East Anglia. DW is also supported by the NIHR HPRU in Behaviour Change and Evaluation, a partnership between the UK Health Security Agency and the University of Bristol.

Open Access: This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Publisher Copyright: © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Citation: Smith LE, Serfioti D, Weston D, et al. Adherence to protective measures among healthcare workers in the UK: a cross-sectional study. Emergency Medicine Journal 2022;39:100-105.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2021-211454

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • disaster planning and response
  • first responders
  • global health
  • infectious diseases

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Adherence to protective measures among healthcare workers in the UK: a cross-sectional study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this