Activities of voriconazole, itraconazole and amphotericin B in vitro against 590 moulds from 323 patients in the voriconazole Phase III clinical studies

Ana Espinel-ingroff, Elizabeth Johnson, Hans Hockey, Peter Troke*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

81 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Fungal pathogens from the voriconazole trials were identified and tested for susceptibility at two reference laboratories. Methods: MICs were measured using CLSI M38-A 48 h microdilution methodology. Results: Moulds from 29 genera and 38 species were isolated from 18 countries. Aspergillus spp. predominated (69%), followed by Scedosporium spp. (11.5%). Aspergillus fumigatus (292/590, 49.5%) was the most common species, followed by Scediosporium apiospermum (9.7%) and Aspergillus terreus (7.3%). The bronchi, lungs and sinuses yielded 45% of the isolates (57% of aspergilli), with 24% from the oropharynx/oesophagus. Other sites included blood/catheter (7.3%) and CNS (5.2%). MIC90s of itraconazole and voriconazole for Aspergillus spp. were the same (0.5 mg/L), but 17 Aspergillus isolates were itraconazole-resistant (MICs ≥1-16 mg/L). Additionally, in 31 A. fumigatus and 23 A. terreus isolates, amphotericin MICs were ≥2.0 mg/L. Voriconazole MICs exceeded 4 mg/L in only 5.8% (34/590) of the isolates, including one A. fumigatus (8.0 mg/L), 9/11 Scedosporium prolificans, 10/13 Fusarium solani and all 9 Zygomycetes. Most were also not susceptible to itraconazole or amphotericin B. A notable increase in MIC (more than two doubling dilutions) during voriconazole therapy was seen for one A. fumigatus isolate. The response rate of voriconazole-treated patients with isolate MICs ≥4.0 mg/L was 38% when compared with 52% for those with MICs <4.0 mg/L. Conclusions: Voriconazole shows activity, in vitro, similar to that of itraconazole against a wide range of moulds. It is also active against some isolates not susceptible to itraconazole or amphotericin B, but not the Zygomycetes. The relationship between voriconazole MIC and clinical outcome requires further study.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)616-620
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
Volume61
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2008

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The data for this manuscript were generated during Pfizer-sponsored, Phase III clinical trials. Both P. T. and H. H. received funding from Pfizer in connection with the development of this manuscript. E. J. and A. E.-I. received funding from Pfizer to run the voriconazole mycological reference laboratories.

Funding Information:
P. T. owns shares in, was previously an employee of, and is currently a consultant to Pfizer. He is also a consultant to and a share owner of Cytomics and has received honoraria from Rothschilds and F2G. H. H. is a statistical consultant to Pfizer. E. J. and A. E.-I. received funding from Pfizer to attend relevant conferences during the study period. E. J. has also received honoraria from Gilead, MSD, Ortho-Biotech, Pfizer, Schering-Plough and Zeneus.

Keywords

  • Aspergillus
  • Clinical outcome
  • Fusarium
  • MIC
  • Scedosporium
  • Zygomycetes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Activities of voriconazole, itraconazole and amphotericin B in vitro against 590 moulds from 323 patients in the voriconazole Phase III clinical studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this