TY - JOUR
T1 - A tale of two countries
T2 - all-cause mortality among people living with HIV and receiving combination antiretroviral therapy in the UK and Canada
AU - the Canadian Observational Cohort (CANOC) - UK Collaborative HIV Cohort (UK CHIC) Collaboration
AU - Patterson, S.
AU - Jose, S.
AU - Samji, H.
AU - Cescon, A.
AU - Ding, E.
AU - Zhu, J.
AU - Anderson, J.
AU - Burchell, A. N.
AU - Cooper, C.
AU - Hill, T.
AU - Hull, M.
AU - Klein, M. B.
AU - Loutfy, M.
AU - Martin, F.
AU - Machouf, N.
AU - Montaner, J. S.G.
AU - Nelson, M.
AU - Raboud, J.
AU - Rourke, S. B.
AU - Tsoukas, C.
AU - Hogg, R. S.
AU - Sabin, C.
AU - Kelly, Deborah
AU - Sanche, Stephen
AU - Wong, Alexander
AU - Antoniou, Tony
AU - Bayoumi, Ahmed
AU - Nosyk, Bohdan
AU - Cotterchio, Michelle
AU - Goldsmith, Charlie
AU - Guillemi, Silvia
AU - Richard Harrigan, P.
AU - Harris, Marianne
AU - Hosein, Sean
AU - Johnston, Sharon
AU - Liddy, Clare
AU - Lima, Viviane
AU - Moore, David
AU - Palmer, Alexis
AU - Phillips, Peter
AU - Rachlis, Anita
AU - Smieja, Marek
AU - Trottier, Benoit
AU - Wainberg, Mark
AU - Walmsley, Sharon
AU - Archibald, Chris
AU - Clement, Ken
AU - Doolittle-Romas, Monique
AU - Delpech, Valerie
AU - Thornton, Alicia
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 The Authors. HIV Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British HIV Association.
PY - 2017/10/1
Y1 - 2017/10/1
N2 - Objectives: We sought to compare all-cause mortality of people living with HIV and accessing care in Canada and the UK. Methods: Individuals from the Canadian Observational Cohort (CANOC) collaboration and UK Collaborative HIV Cohort (UK CHIC) study who were aged ≥ 18 years, had initiated antiretroviral therapy (ART) for the first time between 2000 and 2012 and who had acquired HIV through sexual transmission were included in the analysis. Cox regression was used to investigate the difference in mortality risk between the two cohort collaborations, accounting for loss to follow-up as a competing risk. Results: A total of 19 960 participants were included in the analysis (CANOC, 4137; UK CHIC, 15 823). CANOC participants were more likely to be older [median age 39 years (interquartile range (IQR): 33, 46 years) vs. 36 years (IQR: 31, 43 years) for UK CHIC participants], to be male (86 vs. 73%, respectively), and to report men who have sex with men (MSM) sexual transmission risk (72 vs. 56%, respectively) (all P < 0.001). Overall, 762 deaths occurred during 98 798 person-years (PY) of follow-up, giving a crude mortality rate of 7.7 per 1000 PY [95% confidence interval (CI): 7.1, 8.3 per 1000 PY]. The crude mortality rates were 8.6 (95% CI: 7.4, 10.0) and 7.5 (95% CI: 6.9, 8.1) per 1000 PY among CANOC and UK CHIC study participants, respectively. No statistically significant difference in mortality risk was observed between the cohort collaborations in Cox regression accounting for loss to follow-up as a competing risk (adjusted hazard ratio 0.86; 95% CI: 0.72–1.03). Conclusions: Despite differences in national HIV care provision and treatment guidelines, mortality risk did not differ between CANOC and UK CHIC study participants who acquired HIV through sexual transmission.
AB - Objectives: We sought to compare all-cause mortality of people living with HIV and accessing care in Canada and the UK. Methods: Individuals from the Canadian Observational Cohort (CANOC) collaboration and UK Collaborative HIV Cohort (UK CHIC) study who were aged ≥ 18 years, had initiated antiretroviral therapy (ART) for the first time between 2000 and 2012 and who had acquired HIV through sexual transmission were included in the analysis. Cox regression was used to investigate the difference in mortality risk between the two cohort collaborations, accounting for loss to follow-up as a competing risk. Results: A total of 19 960 participants were included in the analysis (CANOC, 4137; UK CHIC, 15 823). CANOC participants were more likely to be older [median age 39 years (interquartile range (IQR): 33, 46 years) vs. 36 years (IQR: 31, 43 years) for UK CHIC participants], to be male (86 vs. 73%, respectively), and to report men who have sex with men (MSM) sexual transmission risk (72 vs. 56%, respectively) (all P < 0.001). Overall, 762 deaths occurred during 98 798 person-years (PY) of follow-up, giving a crude mortality rate of 7.7 per 1000 PY [95% confidence interval (CI): 7.1, 8.3 per 1000 PY]. The crude mortality rates were 8.6 (95% CI: 7.4, 10.0) and 7.5 (95% CI: 6.9, 8.1) per 1000 PY among CANOC and UK CHIC study participants, respectively. No statistically significant difference in mortality risk was observed between the cohort collaborations in Cox regression accounting for loss to follow-up as a competing risk (adjusted hazard ratio 0.86; 95% CI: 0.72–1.03). Conclusions: Despite differences in national HIV care provision and treatment guidelines, mortality risk did not differ between CANOC and UK CHIC study participants who acquired HIV through sexual transmission.
KW - AIDS
KW - Canada
KW - HIV
KW - UK
KW - antiretroviral therapy
KW - mortality
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018692212&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/hiv.12505
DO - 10.1111/hiv.12505
M3 - Article
C2 - 28440036
AN - SCOPUS:85018692212
SN - 1464-2662
VL - 18
SP - 655
EP - 666
JO - HIV Medicine
JF - HIV Medicine
IS - 9
ER -