A rapid evidence review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of alcohol control policies: an English perspective

Robyn Burton, Clive Henn*, Don Lavoie, Rosanna O'Connor, Clare Perkins, Kate Sweeney, Felix Greaves, Brian Ferguson, Caryl Beynon, Annalisa Belloni, Virginia Musto, John Marsden, Nick Sheron

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    233 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper reviews the evidence for the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of policies to reduce alcohol-related harm. Policies focus on price, marketing, availability, information and education, the drinking environment, drink-driving, and brief interventions and treatment. Although there is variability in research design and measured outcomes, evidence supports the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of policies that address affordability and marketing. An adequate reduction in temporal availability, particularly late night on-sale availability, is effective and cost-effective. Individually-directed interventions delivered to at-risk drinkers and enforced legislative measures are also effective. Providing information and education increases awareness, but is not sufficient to produce long-lasting changes in behaviour. At best, interventions enacted in and around the drinking environment lead to small reductions in acute alcohol-related harm. Overall, there is a rich evidence base to support the decisions of policy makers in implementing the most effective and cost-effective policies to reduce alcohol-related harm.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1558-1580
    Number of pages23
    JournalThe Lancet
    Volume389
    Issue number10078
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 15 Apr 2017

    Bibliographical note

    Publisher Copyright:
    © 2017 Elsevier Ltd

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A rapid evidence review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of alcohol control policies: an English perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this