A comparative study of two developmental scales: The Bayley and the Griffiths

M. Ramsay*, P. M. Fitzhardinge

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

50 high-risk infants consecutively selected from the population of a Neonatal Follow-up Clinic were tested using both the Bayley and the Griffiths Scales on the same day by the same psychologist without prior knowledge of the medical history. The mean age at testing was 13.1 mth with a range of 12-15 mth. Scores obtained from the Griffiths Scale were consistently higher than those obtained from either of the Bayley Scales (P<0.001). Intercorrelations between the Griffiths and the Bayley test were high at pH 0.01. These results suggest that, although the two tests may be used interchangeably, their numerical scores are not equivalent when administered at this age.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)151-157
Number of pages7
JournalEarly Human Development
Volume1
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 1977
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Bayley Scale
  • Griffiths Scale
  • infant testing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A comparative study of two developmental scales: The Bayley and the Griffiths'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this